Amendments to marriage age contradict other laws
Context
-
The Prohibition of Child Marriage Amendment Bill 2021, which seeks to raise the age of marriage for women to 21 years, amends the definition of child to mean “a male or female who has not completed twenty-one years of age”.
-
The amendments proposed to the anti-child marriage law defines a child as someone under the age of 21 years and contradicts laws where the legal age of competence is recognised as 18 years.
Contradictions with Other Laws
- It over-rides personal laws of Hindus, Christians, Muslims and Parsis, as well as the Special Marriage Act, 1954.
- The 61st Constitutional Amendment Act of 1988 defines the voting age for elections to the Parliament and Legislative Assemblies as 18 years.
- The Majority Act, 1875, defines the age of majority as “”the age of eighteen years and not before”, and as 21 years if a guardian is appointed.
- Under the Indian Contract Act, 1872 a person should have attained the age of majority in order to be able to enter into a contract.
- The law to punish sexual crimes against children, the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 too recognises a child as someone under the age of 18 and thereby implies that the age of consent for sex is also 18 years.
- The law that deals with juvenile offenders (or children in conflict with law) and children who need care and protection, that is, the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act, 2015 does the same.
- Under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education, 2009 that guarantees access to education, a child is someone between the ages of 06 to 14 years.
- Under the anti-child labour law or the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2016, which prohibits the engagement of children in all occupations and bans adolescents in hazardous occupations, a child is “a person who has not completed his fourteenth year of age” and an adolescent means “a person who has completed his fourteenth year of age but has not completed his eighteenth year”.
Artificial Distinction
- At one level, we say that the age to enter into contracts and to vote is 18 years.
- We are recognising that a person has the mental capacity to make decisions that will affect her life commercially or as a citizen, but at the same time when it comes to her personal life, she doesn’t have the right to make decisions. The proposed law makes an artificial distinction.
- By making marriages under 21 years invalid, we are criminalising those who marry under this age and depriving them of protections under law.
International Recognition
- UN recognises adolescents as a unique group in terms of life choices, sexual identity, political thoughts, decision making, etc.
- In its “General comment No. 20 (2016) on the implementation of the rights of the child during adolescence”, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child says that “any investment in young people risks being wasted if their rights throughout adolescence do not also receive adequate attention…investment is needed to address the societal drivers serving to exclude and marginalize them [adolescents]”.
Conclusion
- It is necessary to have differential age in terms of determining children’s capacities, but it should be for the advancement of their rights and not to take them [their rights] away. In the context of sexuality, we have to look at the age of consent in a more nuanced manner and recognise that if there are children above 16 years who are sexually active, and it is a normal part of their development, they shouldn’t be criminalised for it. Age doesn’t have to be the same for everything.
Visit Abhiyan PEDIA (One of the Most Followed / Recommended) for UPSC Revisions: Click Here
IAS Abhiyan is now on Telegram: Click on the Below link to Join our Channels to stay Updated
IAS Abhiyan Official: Click Here to Join
For UPSC Mains Value Edition (Facts, Quotes, Best Practices, Case Studies): Click Here to Join