What is the parliamentary system of governance

• As we know, a parliamentary system of governance is a democratic form of government in which the executive branch derives its legitimacy from and is accountable to the legislature or parliament.
• As a result, it is also known as a responsible government. In this system, the Prime Minister is usually the head of government and the leader of the party or coalition with the majority of seats in Parliament.
• Contrastingly, in a presidential system, the head of state – the President – is elected separately and holds independent executive power.

Fusion of power

• The parliamentary system closely intertwines the executive and the legislature, resulting in a fusion of power. The Council of Ministers or the Cabinet headed by the Prime Minister is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha, meaning the entire government must resign if it loses the vote of confidence.
• The system also provides for an alternative government. If the ruling party loses the confidence of the lower house, the opposition party is prepared to take over, ensuring continuity and stability in governance.
• The Indian Parliament, also known as Sansad, is bicameral. It has a multi-party system in which the party with the majority seats, or coalition, forms the government. Thus, it ensures diverse representation within Parliament.
• Countries like India, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and Japan have parliamentary systems.

Advantages and disadvantages

• The parliamentary system offers several advantages such as responsiveness, which allows for swift replacement of the government if it loses parliamentary confidence; flexibility, which enables quick decision-making and adaptation; and power of the executive, which allows majority governments to implement policies effectively.
• However, the system has some disadvantages, which include the concentration of power in the hands of the Prime Minister and the Cabinet, and a lack of checks and balances on the executive, potentially leading to the misuse of power and instability, particularly in coalition governments.
• Ultimately, the suitability of a parliamentary system for a particular country depends on its historical context, political culture, and specific system design, which balances its strengths and weaknesses.

Why did India choose the parliamentary system

Notwithstanding its disadvantages, India has adopted the parliamentary system of governance. The system has many vital features such as:

• • Bicameral Legislature: The Indian Parliament comprises the Lok Sabha (House of the People) and the Rajya Sabha (Council of States). The people of India directly elect Lok Sabha members, while state legislative assemblies’ members elect Rajya Sabha members.
  • Dual Executive System: An electoral college elects the President of India as the ceremonial head of state. The President’s duties are mainly ceremonial, and the Council of Ministers exercises executive powers.
  • Prime Minister’s Role: The Prime Minister is the chief advisor to the President, responsible for running the government, and plays a vital role in the functioning of the Parliament.
• The role of Parliament is to enact laws, control finances, and amend the Constitution. The Lok Sabha plays a critical role in the legislative process and holds the executive accountable through debates, question hours, and various parliamentary committees.

Parliamentary system in India and Britain

• After the end of colonial rule, India adopted a parliamentary system of government from Britain. So, are there any similarities or differences between India and the British Parliamentary systems?

Similarities

• Both countries have a head of state who performs a ceremonial role: the Monarch in the UK and the President in India. However, the Indian President is more powerful than the British ceremonial head.
• Each has a bicameral parliament consisting of an upper house (the House of Lords in the UK and the Rajya Sabha in India) and a lower house (the House of Commons in the UK and the Lok Sabha in India). The principle of collective responsibility ensures that the cabinet, headed by the Prime Minister, is accountable to the parliament and must resign if it loses the vote of confidence.
• Governance is based on majority party rule, with the Prime Minister serving as the leader of the party or coalition with the majority of seats in the lower house. Usually, council members belong to the same political party and share the same political ideology.
• In a coalition government, the consensus binds the ministers. Both systems exhibit that the executive is responsible to the legislature, ensuring a system of checks and balances that is vital for democratic accountability and transparency.

Differences

• Despite having inherited the British parliamentary system, India has many distinct features. Parliamentary sovereignty is a principle of the UK constitution. It gives Parliament the supreme legal authority to create or end any law.
• There is also no provision for judicial review. But India follows a constitutional government where the constitution limits the power of parliament to legislate. The constitution’s basic structure is the pillar of the Indian judiciary.
• The Indian Constitution is a written constitution that defines the government’s limitations. India’s head of state (the President) is indirectly elected for a five-year term, whereas the UK’s head (the Monarch) holds a hereditary position.
• India and the UK have a bicameral legislature. In India, the Rajya Sabha (Council of States) represents the states and union territories, reflecting India’s federal structure. State legislatures elect members of the Rajya Sabha.
• Conversely, the UK’s House of Lords comprises appointed life peers, bishops, and a diminishing number of hereditary peers. In India, the Prime Minister can be from the Lok Sabha or the Rajya Sabha, underscoring the country’s federal nature.
• If the prime minister or ministers are not members of parliament at the time of appointment, they must secure a seat within six months. In contrast, the UK’s Prime Minister is traditionally a member of the House of Commons, ensuring direct electoral accountability.
• The role of the Speaker also differs: In India, a member belonging to the ruling party is generally elected as Speaker, whereas in the UK, the Speaker renounces party affiliation upon election to uphold impartiality.
• India’s parliamentary sessions feature Zero Hour, a unique aspect where members can raise urgent matters without prior notice. The UK has no direct equivalent, although MPs can raise urgent issues through other parliamentary procedures.
• In India, MPs must adhere strictly to party discipline, often voting along party lines. The Anti-Defection Law mandates that MPs who defect from their party face disqualification, necessitating a by-election within six months.
• In contrast, while the UK employs a robust party whip system, MPs occasionally have more flexibility to vote according to their conscience or the interests of their constituents. Unlike India, the UK has no equivalent to anti-defection law, allowing MPs more freedom in voting decisions.
• The representation within the legislative bodies reflects the diversity of each country. India has reserved seats for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes to ensure the representation of marginalized communities. While not having reserved seats, the UK is trying to increase diversity among MPs through party selection processes.
• To sum up, the Indian parliamentary form of government is both very effective and constantly evolving. Here, citizens are able to defend themselves against any orders issued by the government by either knocking on the door of the judiciary or using their right to protest to put pressure on the government. This is exactly what happened in the Farm Laws dispute.

Source: IE

Visit Abhiyan PEDIA (One of the Most Followed / Recommended) for UPSC Revisions: Click Here

IAS Abhiyan is now on Telegram: Click on the Below link to Join our Channels to stay Updated 

IAS Abhiyan Official: Click Here to Join

For UPSC Mains Value Edition (Facts, Quotes, Best Practices, Case Studies): Click Here to Join