Context
-
Tribunal is not part of the original constitution
- 42nd Amendment Act, 1976 with a new Part XIV-A to the Constitution on recommendation of Swaran Singh Committee
- 323-A – deals with Administrative Tribunals.
- 323-B – deals with tribunals for other matters.
- Works on principle of natural justice, not abide by civil procedure code.
- Members are drawn from Judicial and administrative streams.
- Chairpersons of tribunals accorded Status of judges of HC
- They enjoy some of the powers of a civil court e. issuing summons and allowing witnesses to give evidence. Its decisions are legally binding on the parties, subject to appeal.
Art.323 A | Art. 323 B |
Contemplates the establishment of tribunals for public service matters only | Contemplates the establishment of tribunals for certain other matters. E.g. tax, utility services. |
Can be established only by Parliament and not by state legislatures. | Can be established both by Parliament and state legislatures with respect to matters falling within their legislative competence. |
Only one tribunal for the Centre and one for each state or two or more states may be established. No question of the hierarchy of tribunals arises. | A hierarchy of tribunals may be created. |
Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT)
- set up in 1985 with the principal bench at Delhi and additional benches in different states
- Original jurisdiction of CAT – In relation to recruitment and all service matters of public servants covered by it. Jurisdiction extends to the all-India services, Central civil services, civil posts under the Centre and civilian employees of defence services.
- multi-member body consisting of a chairman and members
- Members drawn from both judicial and administrative streams and are appointed by the president.
- Members of the defence forces, officers and servants of the SC and the secretarial staff of the Parliament are not covered by it.
- not bound by the procedure laid down in the CivilProcedure Code of 1908.
- Guided by the principles of natural
- Chairman– For 5 years or until they attain the age of 65 years, whichever is earlier.
- Members – For 5 years or until they attain the age of 62 years, whichever is earlier.
- The appointment of Members in CAT is made on the basis of recommendations of a high-powered selection committee chaired by a sitting Judge of SC who is nominated by CJI.
- After obtaining the concurrence of Chief Justice of India, appointments are made with the approval of Cabinet Committee of Appointments (Headed by PM).
- SC laid down that appeals against the orders of the CAT shall lie before the division bench of the concerned HC and later on in the SC.
State Administrative Tribunals (SATs)
- Administrative Tribunals Act of 1985 empowers the Central government to establish the SATs and Joint administrative tribunal (JAT) for two or more states
- Original jurisdiction of SAT – In relation to recruitment and all service matters of state government employees.
- Set up in the nine states of Andhra Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, Odisha, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal and Kerala
- Chairman and members of the SATs & JATs are appointed by the president after consultation with the governor
Administrative Tribunals
- Administrative Tribunal is a creation of a statute.
- An Administrative Tribunal is vested in the judicial power of the State and thereby performs quasi-judicial functions as distinguished from pure administrative functions.
- Administrative Tribunal is bound to act judicially and follow the principles of natural justice. It is required to act openly, fairly and impartially.
- An Administrative Tribunal is not bound by the strict rules of procedure and evidence prescribed by the civil procedure court and Evidence act.
Court of Law and Tribunal
Court of Law | Tribunal |
A court of law is a part of the traditional judicial system. | An Administrative Tribunal is an agency created by the statute and invested with judicial power. |
The Civil Courts have judicial power to try all suits of a civil nature unless the cognizance is expressly barred. | Tribunal is also known as the Quasi-judicial body. Tribunals have the power to try cases of special matter which are conferred on them by statutes |
Judges of the ordinary courts of law are independent of the executive in respect of their tenure, terms and conditions of service etc. Judiciary is independent of Executive. | Tenure, terms and conditions of the services of the members of Administrative Tribunal are entirely in the hands of Executive. |
A court of law can decide vires of a legislation | Administrative Tribunal cannot do so |
A court of law is bound by all the rules of evidence and procedure. | An Administrative Tribunal is not bound by rules but bound by the principles of nature of Justice. |
The presiding officer of the court of law is trained in law and legal professional. | The president or a member of the Tribunal may not be trained as well in law. He may be an expert in the field of Administrative matters. |
Court must decide all questions objectively on the basis of evidence and materials on record. | Decision of Administrative Tribunal may be subjective rather than objective. Administrative Tribunal may decide questions by taking into account departmental policy. |
‘Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and other Authorities Rules, 2020’
- The ‘Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and other Authorities Rules, 2020’, were framed by the Ministry of Finance in exercise of powers under Section 184 of the Finance Act 2017.
- These apply to 19 Tribunals including CAT; Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Customs, Excise, Service, Tax Appellate Tribunal etc.
- However, Foreigners Tribunals are not covered.
- Appointments to the above Tribunals will be made by Central Government on the recommendations by the “Search cum Selection Committee” composed of:
- CJI or judge nominated by him
- President/chairperson of tribunal concerned
- Two government secretaries from the concerned ministry/department.
- “Search Cum Selection Committee” has the power to recommend the removal of a member, and also to conduct inquiry into allegations of misconduct by a member.
- Only persons having judicial or legal experience are eligible for appointment.
- Rules also provide a fixed term of four years to the Tribunal members.
- The condition in the 2017 Rules (which were set aside by Court) that the members will be eligible for re-appointment has also been dropped in 2020 Rules.
For Other Subject Wise Prelims Revisions: Click Here
For IAS Abhiyan NCERT Notes / Current Affairs / Test Series / Standard Notes : Click here